This perspective has now been tempered by the realization that new infectious disease threats continue to appear and old diseases continue to adapt. The introduction of potent antimicrobial agents and vaccines into modern medicine's arsenal in the last century inspired an overly optimistic prediction of our ability to control or even eradicate specific infectious diseases. It is difficult to resolve this conflict because both options include getting something, but losing something else.The diversity of infectious disease threats currently facing humanity is unprecedented. This conflict be resolved by, for example, choosing one of the options now, but already determining that next time we are in the same situation we will choose the other. The second option is attractive because it involves traveling to a new place, but it is with people we see more often then our family. The first option is attractive because it involves spending time with family we have not seen for a while, but it does not involve traveling to a new location. For example, if we have to choose whether to travel home to holidays and spend time with family (which we have not seen for a long time and probably will not be able to see in near future because of work or college) or travel somewhere with friends from work or college (which we more often, but will also not be able to travel with for a long time if we do not do it now). This is a conflict between two options both of which are attractive and repelling to us. The most common conflict situation is probably double approach-avoidance conflict \textbf double approach-avoidance conflict.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |